Buteyko The Buteyko system for asthma and some other breathing problems believe that breathing too much/overbreathing is the cause of those breathing problems. I have observed that UDB is the primary cause of overbreathing. Dear Mike: Just found this while surfing, confirms what you said about Buteyko, I tried it and it was a waste of money, in fact I ended up in the hospital, quite soon after Barbara From Mike:Thanks Barbara. Buteyko is a form of endogenous breathing. Try it. It works for some, not all. But also realize that you may well have developed a non optimal breathing habit UDB and someday it will begin to restrict your ability to breathe and probably so slowly you will never realize it unless someone has shown you how to breathe fully and in balance without limiting your air supply. From what I have seen, Buteyko controls your responses and conditions you to use more of the same oxygen supply or have less need for oxygen. I believe it does too little to develop your breathing volume (FEV1) to the max. The Framingham Study USA clearly proved it was breathing volume that is the primary market for longevity. I will add efficiency of exhalation to reduce the oxygen cost of breathing (Carl Stough) and support in rebalancing the nervous system. It is NOT about CO2. Excessive CO2 is a byproduct of bad breathing but it is not the root cause. Environment, stress, allergies, nutrition, immune system dysfunction are very relevant factors but poor mechanics and coordination of the breathing are I believe what sets up the tendency towards asthma in the first place. Also, there is a HUGE emotional factor in asthma. See breath holding. I have developed hands on and breathing exercise training techniques that have been very successful in reducing or eliminating inhaler and steroid usage, often in a matter of a few minutes. mike Buteyko, a controversial issue."There are people who "compensate" or are able to tolerate lower levels than that because of their lung disease process" quoted from an email to me from a department head respiratory therapist connected with the Mayo clinic. mgw The alt.support.asthma News Group debates its virtues and downfalls ad nauseam. It's proponents tout it as a cure/treatment for everything from Asthma to Migraine, Hay Fever, Sinus and Allergies, Emphysema and COPD, Severe Snoring and Sleep Apnea. Its critics call it "Quack" Medicine, "Snake Oil", or worse, a money making pyramid scheme to cheat desperate people out of their earnings. My opinion happens to agree with the critics. According to Buteyko Breathing Page, "...asthma is simply your body's way of helping to restrict the amount of air you are breathing, so that more carbon dioxide is trapped in, and a possibly fatal event is avoided. It is just like plumbing - if you want to reduce the flow thru a pipe, simply make it smaller or clog it up." Buteyko is a technique of slowing respirations and decreasing Tidal Volume in an attempt to raise Alveolar CO2 (PACO2). They state that CO2 is an important factor in determining the pH of the blood, which is quite true, but they neglect take into account the buffering effects of hemoglobin and bicarb, effects of hypoxia on breathing and PACO2, or account for the actions of Asthma Triggers. This is in direct opposition to the National Institute of
Health's definition found in the newest 1997 Asthma Treatment
Guidelines: "Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of
the airways in which many cells and cellular elements play a
role, in particular, mast cells, eosinophils, T lymphocytes,
macrophages, neutrophils, and epithelial cells. In susceptible
individuals, this inflammation causes recurrent episodes of
wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, and coughing,
particularly at night or in the early morning. These episodes
are usually associated with widespread but variable airflow
obstruction that is often reversible either spontaneously or
with treatment. The inflammation also causes an associated
increase in the existing bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a
variety of stimuli (NHLBI 1995). Moreover, recent evidence
indicates that subbasement membrane fibrosis may occur in some
patients with asthma and that these changes contribute to
persistent abnormalities in lung function (Roche 1991)."
BUTEYKO: CONTROLLING THE BREATHING PAUSE AKA A SHALLOW
BREATHING
TECHNIQUE (From an email health professional whose name escapes me.) I was intrigued with some of the technical stuff, but they're
(Buteyko trainers) basically
teaching subventilation. Like people need to breathe less. I can't agree
with anything that makes someone afraid of breathing too much. I think the
success that some folks get from Buteyko comes with the feeling of control
one gets from most any regularly applied breathing practice. It's better
to feel in control than to fear that your breath might attack at any
moment. But it's nothing like loving breathing. And it doesn't work
nearly as well against asthma. I think that asthma, like panic disorder/hypervent syndrome,
(UDB-mgw) begins as
a spontaneous self-healing process. The respiratory system has been
challenged, by chronic emotion-suppressing subventilation and/or by some
environmental toxin, pollen, etc, and the body (well-designed as it is)
reacts by hyperventilating. This initiates a healing crisis which can be
terrifying to child and family if no one knows how to help it play through
and resolve. So the healing gets interrupted and the symptoms of
healing-in-process now become symptoms of chronic disease. From then on,
the struggle for breath feeds the fear of breath which increases the
struggle for breath which feeds the fear of breath and on and on. BTW, the big problem I have with Buteyko is that there's no life-energy
in the model. Reducing breath to the oxygen-co2 cycle, is like trying to
understand blood circulation without including the heart." MS From Mike White:
I believe Buteyko works largely because it inhibits sympathetic
nervous system response by holding one's energy static for enough time to
maintain equilibrium and inhibit or detach from associated thought
processes that cause excessive/overstimulated responses.
If it is too intense, breath
holding-back can lock up the entire breathing system. Extending the exhale and
stimulating the reflex does not. But stimulating the reflex may not
work for asthma as well as breath holding-back. I believe breath holding
gives the wrong inner sensing to the breath holder. There are better ways
by using one of our capnometers.
A biofeedback device that lets you watch your CO2 levels on a computer
screen and manipulate the percentage by breathing slightly less or
more. From John Neal Rhodes: Even the reduction of steroid use was not credited to the technique. Rather, the researchers stated that it was possible that the patient where already taking more steroids than needed before testing, quote: "Although during the run-in phase subjects were exhorted to use beta2 agonist therapy strictly on an as required basis, it is likely that in many subjects, the use of these medications and of inhaled steroids was excessive." The most crucial data to prove or disprove the technique, End Expiratory CO2, was unchanged. The whole basis of the technique was to raise this value. On top of this there were no significant changes in PFT values (FEV1 and PEFR), thus no evidence that there was any improvement in the patient's asthma. Let's look at a couple of facts dealing with Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Hyperventilation, and Asthma seen from the traditional medical point of view. First off, Carbon Dioxide (CO2), is a poison, a biproduct of metabolism. The respiratory system eliminates CO2 and provides Oxygen (O2) for the blood stream. CO2 levels effect our rate of breathing, but so does Oxygen levels. When Asthma Triggers or allergic reactions cause an attack to start, the airways respond with inflammation and bronchospasm. Some of the alveoli become closed off and oxygen levels drop. Once enough alveoli stop taking part in gas exchange, oxygen levels reach a point that causes hypoxemia (low blood oxygen levels), see the article on ABGs for explanation of changes in blood gas values during an asthma attack. Hypoxemia will cause the respiratory rate to increase. This increase will effect oxygen and carbon dioxide levels. Carbon dioxide levels will fall and the pH to rise. The drop in CO2 levels is the result, not the cause of an Asthma attack. I challenge the proponents of Buteyko to prove me wrong, not by rhetoric or flawed studies, but by proven, double blind, objective, and published data. I'd love to be proven wrong on this one guys, anything to add to the arsenal we have for this disease. John Neal Rhodes, About.com From Mike: Unless infancy is plagued by abuse, poor nutrition (major cause such as allergies from milk and other dairy etc) and extremely bad air, asthma is largely a mechanical issue. Abuse and fear of abandonment are often the source. Even with poor nutrition, then the mechanical breathing must be optimized to eliminate or minimize emergency drug intervention. I suspect that if you put 100 people in a room with bad air and you will have little to no asthma. Put 100 people together having eaten allergy causing food and the asthma symptoms will increase. Put 100 people together with bad air, bad food and UDB and you will have MANY people with asthma symptoms. I strongly suspect that the drugs and steroids group would like to keep it as a strictly non mechanical issue so that people keep supporting the pharmaceutical industry. The people that advocate excessive drugs and steroids argue against Buteyko for what I deem the wrong reasons as below. Basic Pulmonary Functioning. Dateline: 09/15/97Continuing with the subject of Pulmonary Function Testing (PFT), we will look at some of the most basic terms, concepts, and how they relate to asthmatics. Medical science divides our breathing pattern into a few basic components, these basic findings are important in assessing overall lung function. Understanding these findings and how they change during an asthma attack, helps in understanding some of the major lung changes that take place during an attack. Below is an illustration of a basic Lung Sub test. Starting from the left, a patient is breathing normally for three breaths, takes as deep a breath as possible, then exhales as much as possible, and then returns to normal breathing. Click on the right hand side boxes for definitions of these major lung divisions. (From Mike:) This was not a proper Buteyko procedure and I could not copy the graph so please disregard it.
The
Brisbane trial is the best western study of the
Buteyko Method. The trial results indicated
asthmatics using the Buteyko Method reduced use
of beta-agonists (relievers) by 96% and steroids
by 49%.
The trials were sponsored by the Australian
Association of Asthma Foundations and lead by
Professor Charles Mitchell, and Doctor Simon
Bowler The Brisbane Trials In the study, 19 randomly selected asthmatics
learned the Buteyko Method and 20 other
asthmatics learned standard physiotherapy
exercises. The group taught the Buteyko Method
significantly reduced their beta-agonist intake,
improved control over their asthma, and improved
quality of life. Buteyko subjects reduced their
hyperventilation by an average of 31% in their
minute volume at twelve weeks. There was no
significant change in the control group. There was a correlation between the relative
reduction in need for bronchodilators and the
proportionate reduction in minute volumes in
Buteyko subjects; that is, the subject's need
for bronchodilator medication was related to the
volume of air they breathed. The more air an
individual breathed, the more bronchodilator
that person needed. a) the known link between
hyperventilation and asthma
b) the effectiveness of the
Buteyko Method in normalising breathing
c) the relationship between
the normalisation of breathing and the
reduced need for medication The outcome of the Brisbane trial has led the
Australian National Asthma Campaign to include
Buteyko in their next doctor's asthma Management
Handbook, giving official blessing to the
Buteyko Method. At present, similar trials are planned in New
Zealand, Australia, and the UK. The Victorian
Asthma Foundation has made AUD$20,000 available
for further research into Buteyko. Click here to read a full
version of the trial published in the
Australian Medical Journal. From Mike: All the alt.support.asthma above seems to direct one toward the western medical model of drugs and steroids. So. I would sum it up to say that Buteyko can be a good emergency medical approach for some. I believe it is inherently misleading towards the healthiest way to breathe. It has a distinct western medical "illness model" bias. Shallow breathing eventually will cause the rib cage to be unable to expand as it should UDB. Shallow breathing also inhibits the natural massage of the internal organs UDB. Making the body better efficient to use less oxygen is I believe sub-optimal. Making an organism more efficient such as endogenous respiration (compressing intra lung pressure to make oxygen more concentrated in the blood) is good (more efficient) up to a point. Efficiency does not beget ease if it is very much smaller in volume UDB. Efficiency can only compensate for volume up to a certain point. Also, there is a nervous system aspect that has to do with the parasympathetic depth and its relationship to the relaxation/rest/digest/heal response. Without volume and rib cage expansion there is loss of deepest rest. The ultimate for relaxation, healing, oxygenation would be volume AND efficiency. Then the optimal capacity becomes reachable. Otherwise volume and ease are slowly lost to efficiency. Efficiency also has a stress component to it. Volume does not. The larger car engine runs slower and smoother. The smaller one faster and less smooth. Take careful note of the oxygen information on the upper left of this page. Judge for yourself whether you believe CO2 is more important or is oxygen the primary focus for a long, healthy and vibrant life. Note the information on hyperbaric oxygen chambers. If the CO2 theory were accurate then a having massive amounts of O2 would cause massive wheezing and clearly it does not. Educate yourself and make your choice. Newspaper interview. I recently received an email from a man that represented Buteyko and had his power of attorney that he sent me a copy of. We had a running 7 email dialogue where I offered to have him come to America as my guest and stay with me and join forces to see how we can discover new ways of addressing asthma. His response was "I am really sorry to say but you as well as many many other practitioners in western countries know next to nothing about Breathing. Actually you are copying each other. However - nothing personal, Mike" That said. Med J Aust. 2001 Jan 15;174(2):64-5. The effects of carbon dioxide on exercise-induced
asthma: an unlikely explanation for the effects of Buteyko breathing
training
PMID: 11245506 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
On November 3 2004 I learned that the
Hale Clinic In the UK had ceased using the Buteyko method. I find this
confusing as the technique does have some benefit for some people. The
Hale clinic was to the best of my knowledge the
non Russian western world's leading proponent of the technique. I
suspect that the Buteyko method, while effective with some may worsen
sleep apnea with many others.
Email to Mike: Mike's answers in bold. So essentially what you're saying is that Buteyko reduces one's need for
oxygen? I doubt anyone can ever get too much oxygen or needs
less than they can get breathing naturally. More oxygen is
definitely better. " A recent email. Mike's answers in bold. " Mike, Are you an MD? Not at all. I simply study breathing. I have read hundreds of pages on the Buteyko method that was formulated by very skilled doctors over the course of decades. I have read some of your opinions on the Buteyko method, and it does not appear that you have a total grasp of what is going on. I think some of the concerns that you have are valid however. Once a patient sees improvement, and the brain begins to maintain a higher level of CO2, they must push themselves with exercise. Why should they have to do that? It is there that increased lung capacity is achieved. Even if someone sees less constriction and inflammation, the lungs will not improve in performance unless training takes place. Not so for a significant percentage of gain as experienced by our Breathing Kit Techniques. Many of these patients are long time sufferers, and the lungs have lost some capacity. Some may be permanent. Not likely. Most can make significant improvement. But I suspect that many do not go beyond "getting rid of the symptoms", and over-all lung performance does not improve. Most can make significant improvement. So far we have a very high percentage of success. This is one of the facts that western medicine argues against this method. The fact still remains that people do improve, and they can do more activity with less meds. I agree. It is just not the all to be all that it is represented to be. The problem is people are lazy, lazy may not be the most productive way to think of this. I think of it as either they quickly forget they had a problem or it returns and they do not have the juice to get the juice. and once symptoms get better, they simply go on without taking advantage of new potential. Yes, sadly many take breathing for granted until they can't do it anymore. The purpose of this method is to retrain the brainstem to use higher (more healthy) levels of CO2 to regulate breathing, and keep smooth muscles dilated. If that is accurate it is to me limited/limiting. Then when one exercises, respiration rate and depth of breath will increase, but the brain will try to maintain a higher level of CO2 than before treatment. Agreed. You seem to be going after the same result, but focusing more on the mechanics. Absolutely. I think a good mix of the two are best. Again I agree and that is why we have integrated slowing the breathing down in our 4 Week program. But it is but 1/12th of the options, albeit an important one. The issue is HOW one slows it down. The way many representations I have heard about it the way they go about it does not stem from properly developing it but just slowing it down. There is a high blood pressure machine that gets similar results. Slows breathing down but without really properly developing it. using autos as an example we create "larger breathing engines". They run slower and smoother. Larger and balanced is key. I have high blood pressure, panic attacks, hiatal hernia, and many other issues. I have seen some very good results so far using the Buteyko method. This is after a week. Good for you. Keep it up As long as it works I have no problem with it. . I have found that my ability to get over the hump has improved with this technique, even though I am focusing on shallower breaths. Makes sense but it will not address deeper issues of restricted mechanics. My chest is more clear and open than it has been in years! I do believe that my mechanics need some work, and I have been doing some exercises to better utilize my diaphragm. I have always been a mouth and chest breather. This is a very hard habit to break, but I am making progress. I am also going to try a breathing device designed in Russia that automatically mixes incoming and outgoing air to raise CO2 in the lungs to 6-6.5%. This seems less traumatic than holding ones breath, and achieves the same goal. You hope. Try this then you are ready. www.breathing.com/no-more-asthma.htm Add the BVS. I may take a further look at your program down the line, but the finances are not going to allow it at this point. I know that the Buteyko method is sort of "competition" to you. Not really. I want people to do what works for them. But I would hope that you could work the positive aspects in. There is way too much evidence our there to dismiss it's utility. There is very compelling data. One just has to weed through some of the marketing rhetoric and get to the basis of what it can do to improve our lives. AMEN. But ours works better. A larger engine when properly balanced, runs smoother and slower and it power output is more efficient. mike Another recent email, mike's comments in bold.
Back to Mike. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home |
Overview |
Free Breathing Test |
Free Newsletter |
Store |
Office Visits |
Practitioner Trainings |
Voice Clinic |
Seminars |
|
Articles |
Health Q & A |
Health Tips |
Testimonials |
Miscellaneous |
Affiliate Program |
Contact Us |
About Us |
Links |
Michael Grant White, www.Breathing.com, 1820 Sunhaven Ct, Charlotte, NC, 28262 USA
USA
Toll-Free Phone: 866 MY INHALE (866 694 6425) International Phone: 1 704.594.6775
Fax: 704.597.3927
© Copyright 1997-. All text and images on this web
site are protected by international copyright laws
and may only be used by consent of Michael Grant White.
Terms & Conditions |
Privacy Policy |
Translate |
Currency Converting |
Report Deadlink
The breathing improvement
techniques, practices and products outlined in this publication are extremely
gentle, and should, if carried out as described, be beneficial
to your overall physical and psychological health. If you have any serious medical or
psychological problem, however, such as heart disease,
high blood pressure,
cancer, mental illness, or recent abdominal or chest surgery, you should consult your
health professional before undertaking these practices.